Hi everyone. Hope you can share your knowledge for this...
The Developer "A" and body corporate "B" jointly accused a third party and sue commercial builder company "C". The defendant wins the case as a result and the court order the accusing party to pay for their legal cost.
"B" and "A" had agreed to split the cost 50% each. However, recently "A" said they don't have enough money to pay, so suddenly "B" is getting chased by the commercial builder to pay 100% of the legal cost.
My question is, when the court ordered the losing parties to pay, is there any legal support to say the cost should be shared equally among the two parties?
If we don't believe they don't have enough money as a reason. What else can body corporate "A" do to reduce our payment?
Thanks all.
The Developer "A" and body corporate "B" jointly accused a third party and sue commercial builder company "C". The defendant wins the case as a result and the court order the accusing party to pay for their legal cost.
"B" and "A" had agreed to split the cost 50% each. However, recently "A" said they don't have enough money to pay, so suddenly "B" is getting chased by the commercial builder to pay 100% of the legal cost.
My question is, when the court ordered the losing parties to pay, is there any legal support to say the cost should be shared equally among the two parties?
If we don't believe they don't have enough money as a reason. What else can body corporate "A" do to reduce our payment?
Thanks all.