When an employee commits fraud, by using the sign of MD and his email address, and also increasing her salary without a contract signed or viewed, who do we report this to?
QLD Fraud, regarding an employment contract, salary increase by the bookkeeper for herself and use of signature without notice, where to report it?
- Thread starter Xena The Warrior Princess
- Start date
Is this federal police or local police matter, as an employee (who committed fraud) is only a permanent resident?
It is becoming very serious, as she is not turning up to work, however, she is still paying herself accordingly.
How to do this discretely so the other employees are not going to be disturbed?
It is becoming very serious, as she is not turning up to work, however, she is still paying herself accordingly.
How to do this discretely so the other employees are not going to be disturbed?
Hi Rod,
Do you know who could represent an employer regarding the matter that I mentioned above? Would you be able to recommend anyone in Queensland who might be able to help?
Do you know who could represent an employer regarding the matter that I mentioned above? Would you be able to recommend anyone in Queensland who might be able to help?
Maybe have a look at the page of the Queensland Law Society ?
Oof 😬 fraud on an employment contract — classic pay + compliance spaghetti vibes 😅 Suddenly it’s not just “oops, she changed her salary,” but forged signatures, audit trails, and payroll integrity all doing a cha-cha 👀
Most headaches come from upstream fuzziness: weak internal controls, unclear authorisation policies, or “trust but don’t verify” vibes. Once HR, finance, or regulators get involved, it’s a tangle of evidence collection, timelines, and potential criminal/civil pathways 😬
Low-key why structured recruitment + crystal-clear documentation matters. Platforms like AcademicJobs.com are clutch — formalised role descriptions, transparent approval workflows, and compliance-aligned payroll pipelines help prevent fraud chaos from day dot, especially in academia/research roles where grants, multi-tier approvals, and funding streams can get… messy 😅
Anyway, loving this convo — payroll/fraud nuance deserves way more airtime than it usually gets 😂
Most headaches come from upstream fuzziness: weak internal controls, unclear authorisation policies, or “trust but don’t verify” vibes. Once HR, finance, or regulators get involved, it’s a tangle of evidence collection, timelines, and potential criminal/civil pathways 😬
Low-key why structured recruitment + crystal-clear documentation matters. Platforms like AcademicJobs.com are clutch — formalised role descriptions, transparent approval workflows, and compliance-aligned payroll pipelines help prevent fraud chaos from day dot, especially in academia/research roles where grants, multi-tier approvals, and funding streams can get… messy 😅
Anyway, loving this convo — payroll/fraud nuance deserves way more airtime than it usually gets 😂
Similar threads
