Yes they are interim orders that time be spent as agreed. He is the party that moved away after I made an application to court. I am represented but this is still a really lonely process as the buck stops with me. I just wanted opinions on this scenario on it's own, in isolation of 'other incidents' that ended in an ambulance emergency treatment and another with surgery. The whole situation makes me feel sick. On this occaision there was some kind of report made to Child Safety but it was not investigated as the children aren't in the care of the father. ( I can't remember the wording) but the ICL got it. I like seeing the point of view of others though because although I've seen many blunt and what some have interpreted as insulting opinions to their questions at the time I think it's good practice for the critical thinking that a judge might apply. Each time that something has happened, in isolation of anything else I've had the same thought process that the good people posting their thoughts have and decided that it wasn't enough to interefere with the kids spending time with dad. At what point is enough enough? I was told by ICU while our boy was still on life support that there was no way to tell if he'd suffered brain damage, we'd have to wait and see, his oxygen was so low when he arrived at hospital and they had know way of knowing if he'd been like that all night or longer. Luckily, even though there was some concern when he woke up he's gone on to return to normal.
Will the court look at the incidents with a compoiunding view or at each incident in isolation of the other?
Will the court look at the incidents with a compoiunding view or at each incident in isolation of the other?
