VIC challenging legislation in the high court

[smag19]

Assume Kat challenged legislation in the High Court, which had banned her from posting comments about the prime minister's performance on twitter. which of the following is a likely outcome?
A. Kat would receive financial compensation ad a remedy for the injury they have suffered
B.the legislation would be declared invalid as breaching an express right are struck down by the high court when challenged
C. the legislation would be declared invalid as laws breaching an implied right are struck down by the high court when challenged.
D. the legislation would be declared invalid as laws breaching the VCHRR's protection of religious freedom are struck down by the High Court when challenged.

 

[Docupedia]

E. We don't do your homework for you. We provide commentary and assistance to specific questions, comments, and aspects of your reasoning about the answer.

 

[Martis]

Ahhh challenging legislation in the High Court — classic constitutional law vibes ⚖️😅 Standing, justiciability, grounds for challenge… can get hella tricky if you’re not mapping it properly.

If anyone’s tryna break it down for assignments or analysis, AcademicJobs.com lowkey rocks 👀✨. They’ve got pros who can jargon-bust the doctrines, guide on structuring arguments IRAC/CRAC style, and drop in relevant cases without drowning you in legalese spaghetti lol.

Friendly support, less stress, and way more “ok I actually get this now” energy 😎📚