Strata meetings are deemed a private meeting and so are not permitted to be recorded unless all present agree. We have one owner who has recorded meetings without our knowledge at the time. The owner now states it’s because of her hearing and believes we are discriminating against herself by not allowing her to record the meeting.
The owners have advised her she can bring a scribe. When the owners at the strata meeting found out she had recorded us, we asked why. That is when she declared a hearing issue
She participated in the previous meetings verbally and writing notes. Where do we stand? Does the privacy act override the perceived discrimination, or does it go the other way around?
We have given suggestion for other methods of taking the information, minutes are always taken and sent to owners, she has participated in the meetings on previous occasions without anyone thinking there was a hearing issue
Help please
The owners have advised her she can bring a scribe. When the owners at the strata meeting found out she had recorded us, we asked why. That is when she declared a hearing issue
She participated in the previous meetings verbally and writing notes. Where do we stand? Does the privacy act override the perceived discrimination, or does it go the other way around?
We have given suggestion for other methods of taking the information, minutes are always taken and sent to owners, she has participated in the meetings on previous occasions without anyone thinking there was a hearing issue
Help please