So, I have a question someone in the know can answer.
If Ms X, and Mr Y, are going though family court, and Ms X is represented by legal aid.
Ms X then takes out a dvo/avo/ivo against Mr Y
Mr Y does the agree without contest (what ever its called)
Ms X then gets a trivial breach put on Mr Y, Mr Y pays the fine and moves on.
Now because this has taken place, and even though Ms X refuses to talk to Mr Y in any way shape or form with regards to the childs best interests and refuses to co-parent whatsoever (and Mr X is now allowed in the Fed Court Orders to email Ms X)
Normally at this stage Legal Aid say to Ms X to start acting like an adult or we will pull your funding, yet what I have heard recently is that because a breach was carried out on Ms X that Legal Aid must now fund the Family Court Hearing all the way through the trial as well?
Can anyone confirm or deny that this is now a practice of Legal Aid?
If Ms X, and Mr Y, are going though family court, and Ms X is represented by legal aid.
Ms X then takes out a dvo/avo/ivo against Mr Y
Mr Y does the agree without contest (what ever its called)
Ms X then gets a trivial breach put on Mr Y, Mr Y pays the fine and moves on.
Now because this has taken place, and even though Ms X refuses to talk to Mr Y in any way shape or form with regards to the childs best interests and refuses to co-parent whatsoever (and Mr X is now allowed in the Fed Court Orders to email Ms X)
Normally at this stage Legal Aid say to Ms X to start acting like an adult or we will pull your funding, yet what I have heard recently is that because a breach was carried out on Ms X that Legal Aid must now fund the Family Court Hearing all the way through the trial as well?
Can anyone confirm or deny that this is now a practice of Legal Aid?
