Unfortunately, I ended up with an intervention order issued by the Police on the basis on an incident that happened 6 weeks ago based on a false allegation from my 11-year-old.
Police called me one day while it was a normal day and issued a Safety Notice. I agreed to accept an IVO on the hearing date without any admissions, exempting my kids, which was rejected by the police. So I have been issued with a no-contact interim intervention order.
The following are also mentioned in the safety notice:
There is also mention of me being physically abusive on the kids recently and showing controlling behaviours and verbally abusive on the AFM without any dates.
In terms of history, there were mentions about 3 family violence incidents, the latest one was in 2009. Police turned up and none of them progressed any further as I am not the aggressor and there is no evidence.
I would really like to contest the IVO as the incident mentioned with the kid was completely false and I was the person who has been physically abused on the day. I was never ever physical with kids, including being physical to defend myself. I do have evidence of recordings on the incident with the 11-year-old but I am not sure if they will be valid in court.
A neighbour witness can also be available, proving that the story cannot be woven without doubt as they saw us at the time of the incident. While the mother-in-law witnessed my agony on the day, I am assuming she will not give any evidence in my favour. I am guessing the police should have tried to get evidence on this with no luck.
Other than that occasion and normal parental heated discussions with children off and on, the relationship with the 11-year-old girl and the 17-year-old boy is very constructive and I usually spend decent the time to nurture the kids to do well in studies as well as responsible citizens.
Now I have this no contact interim intervention order with AFM and kids. While I pleaded the judge to grant me access to the 17-year-old, who is in a tough VCE year, it was rejected by the AFM.
DHS says the two kids don't want to see me now, possibly brainwashed by the AFM.
My questions are:
- Should I contest the IVO on the deferral hearing due in a couple of weeks?
- What are the implications of me contesting the case when I approach the Federal Court for parenting orders in the coming weeks? AFM rejected my requests via a lawyer to even meet the kids once.
- Would DHS help in any way convincing the AFM to meet my kids as I sent a request to DHS to liaise with AFM to catch up with kids in a short meeting?
I hope you all will be part of my journey to keep me strong as I am innocent and been a victim of this trend around families with financial motives by women assisted by the family lawyers. The AFM from what I know over decades of marriage could not have done anything like this without the legal firm helping her to make a false case against me.
Police called me one day while it was a normal day and issued a Safety Notice. I agreed to accept an IVO on the hearing date without any admissions, exempting my kids, which was rejected by the police. So I have been issued with a no-contact interim intervention order.
The following are also mentioned in the safety notice:
There is also mention of me being physically abusive on the kids recently and showing controlling behaviours and verbally abusive on the AFM without any dates.
In terms of history, there were mentions about 3 family violence incidents, the latest one was in 2009. Police turned up and none of them progressed any further as I am not the aggressor and there is no evidence.
I would really like to contest the IVO as the incident mentioned with the kid was completely false and I was the person who has been physically abused on the day. I was never ever physical with kids, including being physical to defend myself. I do have evidence of recordings on the incident with the 11-year-old but I am not sure if they will be valid in court.
A neighbour witness can also be available, proving that the story cannot be woven without doubt as they saw us at the time of the incident. While the mother-in-law witnessed my agony on the day, I am assuming she will not give any evidence in my favour. I am guessing the police should have tried to get evidence on this with no luck.
Other than that occasion and normal parental heated discussions with children off and on, the relationship with the 11-year-old girl and the 17-year-old boy is very constructive and I usually spend decent the time to nurture the kids to do well in studies as well as responsible citizens.
Now I have this no contact interim intervention order with AFM and kids. While I pleaded the judge to grant me access to the 17-year-old, who is in a tough VCE year, it was rejected by the AFM.
DHS says the two kids don't want to see me now, possibly brainwashed by the AFM.
My questions are:
- Should I contest the IVO on the deferral hearing due in a couple of weeks?
- What are the implications of me contesting the case when I approach the Federal Court for parenting orders in the coming weeks? AFM rejected my requests via a lawyer to even meet the kids once.
- Would DHS help in any way convincing the AFM to meet my kids as I sent a request to DHS to liaise with AFM to catch up with kids in a short meeting?
I hope you all will be part of my journey to keep me strong as I am innocent and been a victim of this trend around families with financial motives by women assisted by the family lawyers. The AFM from what I know over decades of marriage could not have done anything like this without the legal firm helping her to make a false case against me.