The key msg in these cases is - every case is different. You have this notion of fairness that is blinding you. Forget about what is fair. Totally not relevant.
You negotiate a mutually acceptable figure or do nothing and let it play out in court. At the moment it is your choice how this plays out. Refuse to play ball and you get a judge who will listen to both sides and make a decision. Your notion of fairness has no part in the decision making process of a judge. Will your ex get something? Most likely yes. Will she get $65k? Most likely no.
Your ex has already done some maths. $65k if she goes to court less $15k costs = $50k.
How much are going to spend to get the figure close to what you want?
Question - is she bluffing about going to court, knowing she has already seen a lawyer who has said she will get $65k? You know her better than we do.
I say again, forget what is fair, the court uses its own rules, not yours. And it doesn't matter what I think. What matters is what does the ex intend to do.
You negotiate a mutually acceptable figure or do nothing and let it play out in court. At the moment it is your choice how this plays out. Refuse to play ball and you get a judge who will listen to both sides and make a decision. Your notion of fairness has no part in the decision making process of a judge. Will your ex get something? Most likely yes. Will she get $65k? Most likely no.
Your ex has already done some maths. $65k if she goes to court less $15k costs = $50k.
How much are going to spend to get the figure close to what you want?
Question - is she bluffing about going to court, knowing she has already seen a lawyer who has said she will get $65k? You know her better than we do.
I say again, forget what is fair, the court uses its own rules, not yours. And it doesn't matter what I think. What matters is what does the ex intend to do.