- Australia's #1 Legal Community is a community of 10,000+ Australians, just like you, helping each other.
Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
Join us, it only takes a minute:

QLD Property Settlement - Not De Facto but Living Together?

Discussion in 'Family Law Forum' started by Hard done by!, 15 July 2015.

Find a Lawyer Form
Find a Lawyer Form
Find a Lawyer Form
  1. Hard done by!

    Hard done by! Member

    15 July 2015
    Likes Received:

    Over three years ago I ended a de facto relationship that had lasted 10 years on and off. Since then my ex stayed in my house in separate bedrooms and we lived separate lives in every way. No financial, social, domestic, sexual etc. dependency on each other. No joint accounts nothing. Even to the point of not attending as a couple, family weddings or funerals.

    She moved out of the house recently and now has booked a court date for a property settlement. My response to her lawyer was that there is no property settlement claim, because for the last nearly four years we did not satisfy the 5 areas of legal definition and requirement of what constitutes a de facto relationship in Australia. And that any court application is no applicable because the action is "out of time".

    Their response is that my ex disputes this in regards to the relationship and states (untruthfully) it was a true de facto arrangement.

    My question is why should I face a family court action when I am disputing the relationship's validity over the last few years. Can there be a separate pre court case or hearing to determine the validity of the action before the expense and time of a family court property settlement?
  2. Sophea

    Sophea Well-Known Member

    16 April 2014
    Likes Received:
    Hi Hard done by,

    If her lawyers can see (based on your evidence that you will show the court), that you were not living as a de facto couple - i.e. no financial intermingling, affidavits from family members stating non attendances of one partner to weddings etc, which proves you were not de fact as of 5 years ago and her lawyers are satisfied a court will find in your favour they will be more likely to settle (and try to talk some sense into her) and not proceed with the court hearing. What is she claiming?

Share This Page