NSW Issues with Child Protection - What to Do?

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

AllForHer

Well-Known Member
23 July 2014
3,664
684
2,894
'Good reason' is subjective, and immaterial. What is good reason to the Department, may not be good reason to the person it affects, but just because a person doesn't agree with the action of a government authority, doesn't give them freedom to ignore it.
 

robert3016

Active Member
1 August 2016
8
0
31
They say they are there for the children's welfare, so how does keeping a three-year-old away from there mother for a week good for their welfare?

She cries every night, then she asks if mummy is coming home today. Then we drive 30 mins a day, sometimes 1hr just to sit in a tiny room. How is that good for a child? They need to worry about children that need the money.
 

Rod

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
27 May 2014
7,731
1,056
2,894
www.hutchinsonlegal.com.au
They say they are there for the children's welfare,

That's not a sufficient reason to intervene. I meant 'Good reason' in an objective way, not subjective. The Department is not allowed to have a 'subjectively' good reason either.
 

AllForHer

Well-Known Member
23 July 2014
3,664
684
2,894
Well, hey, by all means, don't do as the Department asks and head home. What would we know?
 

robert3016

Active Member
1 August 2016
8
0
31
It's all good. I've got a solicitor and they're onto to it, so hopefully they are going to leave us alone after this and go and do what they're meant to. Thanks for your help, people

Cheers
 

sammy01

Well-Known Member
27 September 2015
5,153
721
2,894
Yep, gov't workers need to have a valid reason. That is all good and well. But Docs are a law onto themselves. Crazy people with way to much power. They don't understand it when you say 'I don't agree". What they hear is that you are defying their power and they are crazy people with too much power.

Seriously, stay in the hospital for 5 days is heaps better than putting those nutters off-side. Only once you've felt the wrath of their stupidity will you understand.
 

robert3016

Active Member
1 August 2016
8
0
31
Well, we will see what they got to say after the solicitor has talked to them and see if they back off then. Should find out in an hour.
 

BESTRONG

Member
3 August 2016
1
0
1
Be receptive to advice or directions from them, have an observer with you at all meetings, confirm everything in writing. Ensure all meetings are formal with an agenda, be wary of going to court with Legal Aid, and put anything you wish the court to hear in affidavit format, do not provide opportunities for them to develop their own agenda, or write for the audience. Seek their file notes of any meetings, and politely via email rectify any errors.

It is essential for record keeping / evidence, any future issues that may arise. As soon as any matter goes to Court, litigation is adversarial, ethics and the law are not the same. Treat them with respect at all times, but do not become a casualty of not recognising the legal process. Unfortunately, there are some real bad operators in Child Protection, and sadly not enough that take pride in their work, are authentic, and ethical.

Good luck.