My husband and I have a long running dispute trying to get a fallen down fence between ours and our neighbour's property replaced. After several years, we have taken the matter to the ACT Tribunal for a determination and await our hearing to settle the matter.
There are several other issues including one of their trespass onto our property and destruction of trees not overhanging the property line. All that aside, today the police arrived and issued my husband with an interim DVO claiming he had been aggressive on several occasions to the neighbour's wife, who truth be known, neither my husband nor myself would recognise her if we saw her as up until the damage to our trees on the property line last weekend.
We had no view of their property and they had none of ours. My husband has only had two brief exchanges with her, at their front door, when he has gone to discuss the fence. These occasions were more than 10 months apart and the last time was around four months ago when we made our final attempt to discuss the fence replacement prior to submitting an application to ACAT early this year.
I am stunned that an interim order was issued when there is no evidence, nothing to implicate my husband and as stated, no contact for several months. After last week's trespass onto our property and its destruction, we sent the neighbours an email requesting they do not enter the property, reminded them of their right to prune and that further trespass would be reported.
We were intending to take civil action if required. As I spend a lot of time home alone, and the neighbour has made many aggressive and disturbing comments when he thinks we might hear them, we also installed 24 hour video surveillance of our property and advised him of such.
The DVO was taken out a few days after this, we suspect in retaliation. The statement attached is almost completely false, and defames my husband repeatedly. There are many outright lies and fabrications which I can actually refute through documents and photos.
My husband is a professional man of almost 60 years who does not deserve this sullying of his reputation, or the embarrassment. I think we need representation, as we have absolutely no experience with this type of nasty dishonest behaviour.
Has anyone any suggestions on where I should go first with this? or suggestions of legal counsel in Canberra city with experience in this type of vexatious claim?
Thank you in anticipation.
There are several other issues including one of their trespass onto our property and destruction of trees not overhanging the property line. All that aside, today the police arrived and issued my husband with an interim DVO claiming he had been aggressive on several occasions to the neighbour's wife, who truth be known, neither my husband nor myself would recognise her if we saw her as up until the damage to our trees on the property line last weekend.
We had no view of their property and they had none of ours. My husband has only had two brief exchanges with her, at their front door, when he has gone to discuss the fence. These occasions were more than 10 months apart and the last time was around four months ago when we made our final attempt to discuss the fence replacement prior to submitting an application to ACAT early this year.
I am stunned that an interim order was issued when there is no evidence, nothing to implicate my husband and as stated, no contact for several months. After last week's trespass onto our property and its destruction, we sent the neighbours an email requesting they do not enter the property, reminded them of their right to prune and that further trespass would be reported.
We were intending to take civil action if required. As I spend a lot of time home alone, and the neighbour has made many aggressive and disturbing comments when he thinks we might hear them, we also installed 24 hour video surveillance of our property and advised him of such.
The DVO was taken out a few days after this, we suspect in retaliation. The statement attached is almost completely false, and defames my husband repeatedly. There are many outright lies and fabrications which I can actually refute through documents and photos.
My husband is a professional man of almost 60 years who does not deserve this sullying of his reputation, or the embarrassment. I think we need representation, as we have absolutely no experience with this type of nasty dishonest behaviour.
Has anyone any suggestions on where I should go first with this? or suggestions of legal counsel in Canberra city with experience in this type of vexatious claim?
Thank you in anticipation.