NSW Exchange of Evidence Between Parties - Different in Small Claims Court?

Get Instant Legal Answers - Free AI Legal Help
Join thousands of Australians each month using LawConnect’s AI assistant for fast, personalised legal information. No waiting. No cost. Start now.
Ask Your Question Now

TKC

Well-Known Member
12 January 2016
32
11
149
Sydney
Small Claims Court (SCC).

Motor Vehicle Liability + Quantum Matter.

A pre-trial review concluded without the defendant furnishing the plaintiff the evidence he will rely upon at trial.

Are procedures different in the SCC with respect of the exchange of evidence between the parties? My understanding is that if the defendant has evidence which will make negotiated terms for settlement through conciliation likely, the defendant is compelled by law to provide such evidence to the plaintiff.
 

Victoria S

Well-Known Member
9 April 2014
518
59
2,289
The purpose of small claims court is to conduct proceedings with as little formality and technicality as the matter permits. The rules of evidence do not apply and there is a presumption against the cross-examination of witnesses, however i would have thought that something like not disclosing evidence prior to trial would not come within those "rules of evidence" as it has the potential to unfairly disadvantage the other party.