QLD Enforcement of Binding Child Support Agreement (BCSA)

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

SLB70

Active Member
11 August 2021
10
0
31
Hi 247Mum, sorry to hear Its ongoing. I'm at the CSA AAT tribunal process as I submitted a change of assessment prior to the BCSA being signed off, so far they don't seem bothered by the BCSA whereas the advice from CSA officers was they couldn't take action with a BCSA in place so in my experience thus far a change of assessment was worth pursuing to get to the appeal tribunal stage and they've stated if the other party fails to comply with financial disclosure they can apply negative inference.

I'm also keen to hear anyone's advice from this site on the process of an enforcement warrant vs hearing as I have other expenses included in the BCSA that the AAT can't cover eg private health.
Many thanks
 

247mum

Well-Known Member
1 September 2014
17
2
74
Was the agreement regarding child support part of a broader BFA under PART VIIIA of the family law act or a stand alone BCSA, & did both parties agree to have it be a registered agreement with the CSA?

Obviously I can't comment on your likelihood of success should you seek to have it enforced via the FCCoA, BUT, depending on the answer to my questions, if it's a accepted as a BCSA then under the CS Assessment act, the test for setting aside is not a material change in circumstances, but exceptional circumstances, which is a higher bar. Also if it was agreed by both parties to be registered with the CSA as a BCSA, then again much less wriggle room for him.
Hi Atticus. Thank you so much for your comments and questions.

Yes - the BCSA was/is a stand alone BCSA. We both had to have lawyers explain it and sign it off. It was/is registered with CSA - his solicitor sent it to them and never even provided me with a copy - I had to get a copy from CSA. Essentially it states that we will have Child support as assessed, and in addition, we will each bear 50% of the school costs of them attending their current school.

CSA will enforce the 'child support as assessed', but won't consider any recovery of the additional school costs.

The Property settlement Orders that were lodged when we were in Family Court had a notation that we would be entering into a BCSA - I now realise this was probably a clever move by his solicitor to have a notation rather than a clause.

Essentially he got most of the real property - 2 houses that were mortgaged and some investments. He has had changes in circumstances, and so have I - as expected over the course of the 13 or so years that the BCSA covers. He currently (still) earns more than I do, has married, and had 2 more children. He developed a recreational drug habit with his wife that became a big problem for them, hence squandering the proceeds of the 2 houses. Maybe that would be classed as exceptional? This was well documented in the Children's proceedings and reflected in the Children's orders, so I don't really even consider it a change in circumstances but it's hard to know what a court would decide. We can all shirk our responsibilities if we choose.

As the children are both in high school now the fees are becoming crippling for me. But it is their community, not just a school, and they are excellent students. We are very fortunate now to have part scholarships.

What has put me off all along is the fact that I will have to find the funds to pay a solicitor and go back through court with no real certainty of recouping 1/2 the costs. He has investments that I put in place that mature in a couple of years - I could possibly put a caveat on if I was to be successful. If I had known this was how hard it would be to survive and not disrupt the children I would definitely have not done things this way.

Anyway, thank you for your comments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atticus

247mum

Well-Known Member
1 September 2014
17
2
74
Hi 247Mum, sorry to hear Its ongoing. I'm at the CSA AAT tribunal process as I submitted a change of assessment prior to the BCSA being signed off, so far they don't seem bothered by the BCSA whereas the advice from CSA officers was they couldn't take action with a BCSA in place so in my experience thus far a change of assessment was worth pursuing to get to the appeal tribunal stage and they've stated if the other party fails to comply with financial disclosure they can apply negative inference.

I'm also keen to hear anyone's advice from this site on the process of an enforcement warrant vs hearing as I have other expenses included in the BCSA that the AAT can't cover eg private health.
Many thanks
Thank you for your thoughts.
I went to the Tribunal once too through COA. That was how I ended up with the report that they will not enforce any extraneous costs / agreements in the BCSA & that I need to go back through Federal Circuit to enforce those costs.

I wish you all the best. It just shouldn't be this hard in my opinion.
 

SLB70

Active Member
11 August 2021
10
0
31
Thank you for your thoughts.
I went to the Tribunal once too through COA. That was how I ended up with the report that they will not enforce any extraneous costs / agreements in the BCSA & that I need to go back through Federal Circuit to enforce those costs.

I wish you all the best. It just shouldn't be this hard in my opinion.
No it shouldn’t and it would be helpful if schools developed financial policies and followed them through. I’ll update you if I find out anymore, I’m chatting with my lawyer next week about enforcement. Take care.