Please help me so I have a problem. There has been a bailment for a fixed term. Thus, the plaintiff has a right to future possession. However before the term of the bailment was completed the item was given away. In order to be successful for a claim in conversion the plaintiff must have been in possession at the time of the original unauthorised act, or have had a right to immediate possession. As the term of the bailment has now ended the plaintiff has a right to immediate possession but at the time he didn't. Does conversion apply here or does there have to be a right to immediate possession at the time of the unauthorised act?