Homework Question - Estoppel Case with Director and Another Director's Wife?

Discussion in 'Australian Law Students Forum' started by Economist, 11 June 2016.

  1. Economist

    Economist Member

    11 June 2016
    Likes Received:
    Suppose this is a promissory estoppel case:

    A - Director of a company
    B - Director of another company
    C - B's wife

    Suppose that the scenario is similar to Cosmopolitan Hotel v Crown Melbourne (2014).

    A is leasing premises to B. B wants a longer lease. For it to be renewed, A sees B's wife, C, at a Christmas party. During the conversation A says that he will 'look after' B if he abides by the terms of the lease. Then A requires B to vacate the premises at the end of the lease.

    A makes a promise to C. Would it be reasonable for B to rely on it if it was made to his wife?

    It makes me think of Legione v Hateley where a promise involved a secretary, and that was not reasonable. So my guess is that B's wife would not be reasonable but I'm not sure.
  2. Victoria S

    Victoria S Well-Known Member

    9 April 2014
    Likes Received:
    I would also consider the fact that the promise is quite vague - A simply stated that he would "look after" B. Was there any other information about the conversation between A and C?
    This is a strangely worded sentence. Did A approach C to discuss renewal?
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...

Share This Page