WA Racist Comment at Work - Gross Misconduct Under Employment Law?

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

Mate

Well-Known Member
4 March 2016
27
0
121
The simple answer is that it is not that simple. Summary termination needs to involve 'serious misconduct', but that is an imprecise term: some 'black', some 'white', and a lot of 'grey area'. Getting it wrong is a costly exercise for an employer, so they may err on the side of caution.

Then, consider the degree of seriousness. It's not just that they breach the policy - but how and to what extent. Think of it this way (using extreme cases to make the distinction clear): Let's say the policy prohibits stealing. You have one employee who pinches a couple of boxes of paperclips for the kids' art project for school. You have another employee who has been siphoning off bits of the pay run for several years into a slush fund, and is about to permanently move to Brazil next week. Both are stealing - both are breaking the policy. One may get a warning. The other will get met by the police at the airport unless she's very lucky.
Thanks very much Rob. That was a good example:).

A couple of questions if you wouldn't mind:

1. From your own experience, what would be the appropriate disciplinary outcome in this particular example?
2. Hypothetically speaking, let's say the individual was terminated. The individual is on 150k+ salary and not covered by an agreement or award hence is excluded from lodging an unfair dismissal claim to FWC. Can they still take company to court for an unfair dismissal?

Many thanks.
 

Rod

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
27 May 2014
7,726
1,056
2,894
www.hutchinsonlegal.com.au
Again not so simple. BTW I also like @Rob's analogy.

1. Would need to see the minutiae of the facts before forming an educated opinion. Could go either way. With the limited information I have, a warning doesn't seem unreasonable.

2. Yes, it may be the person is covered by a modern award or EA. But a good lawyer will consider wrongful dismissal as well which bypasses the Fair Work Act restrictions.
 

Rob Legat - SBPL

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
16 February 2017
2,452
514
2,894
Gold Coast, Queensland
lawtap.com
Rod's correct, it would depend on a consideration of all the relevant factors.