I have 2 witness statements that don't match. Both claim to have seen alleged incident, but both put each other & themselves at different location at the alleged offence address. They also say different things. One witness is claiming to have done something that is not realistic at all (walk backwards over uneven ground up, step to paving around corner, then step through a small gateway approx 9 metres all up).The times have changed from the QP9. The Police Officer states seeing an object in different location to the complainant. Crime scene photos show a set of unknown boot prints. Crime weapon removed but its actual location is not specific. The Complainants waited 20 minutes to call police, but are claiming serious injuries. No ambulance. I've provided legal counsel with at least 8 pages of info. Any information about relevance under criminal law much appreciated.