I never said the relationship between my mum & my daughter was more important! I'm annoyed as he agreed to let them have this time together & now that we are going from being able to see them whenever we wanted, to maybe a couple of times a year. I want him to honour that & let them have this holiday together as my little girl has been looking forward to it since we agreed upon it. As for the orders they were consent orders.@ Susan88. Firstly. These consent orders you keep referring to that you didn't sign. Where they meant to be filed with the court or were they just agreements made through the the lawyers? If the latter, they are agreements only. Lawyers do not have the same authority as the court, consent orders must be filed and stamped.
Secondly. I once assisted a father who was an absolute idiot, to put it bluntly. He had already filed his initiating application before I came onto the scene. His orders were not realistic and he couldn't quite grasp why 50/50 would not be practicable when he worked interstate 3 out of every 5 weeks. His idea was that either his girlfriend, his mother or even his girlfriends mother could have the kids on the weeks he was away. His ex had other ideas and so did the court.
It is very important for children to spend time with other significant people in their life, including maternal and paternal grandparents. However, these people, unless there are safety concerns for the children, should never be a replacement for parents.
How would you feel if you were placed in your ex's position? You seem to be saying that the relationship between your mum and kids is both more important and meaningful to them than spending time with their dad. I would suggest the court may have other ideas about that.