I'm asking about laws in NSW, Australia.
I believe result of a lie detector, even obtained at court in front of jury, is not admitted as evidence, am I right? I believe result of a robot, even obtained at court in front of jury, is not admitted as evidence, am I right?
What about result of a closed source computer program? The programmer, who is the maker of the computer program, testifies at the court, answers questions, but refuses to release the source code of the computer program, and hence does not explain step by step how he or she obtains the result.
In my view, the closed source computer program acts just like a lie detector, or a robot.
Are there Australian laws to allow admittance of the result as evidence?
Are there Australian laws to ban admittance of the result as evidence?
I believe result of a lie detector, even obtained at court in front of jury, is not admitted as evidence, am I right? I believe result of a robot, even obtained at court in front of jury, is not admitted as evidence, am I right?
What about result of a closed source computer program? The programmer, who is the maker of the computer program, testifies at the court, answers questions, but refuses to release the source code of the computer program, and hence does not explain step by step how he or she obtains the result.
In my view, the closed source computer program acts just like a lie detector, or a robot.
Are there Australian laws to allow admittance of the result as evidence?
Are there Australian laws to ban admittance of the result as evidence?