What are the effects of the outcome of Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52 (Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52 (15 November 2012)) on the 4 step approach to property division?
Do they only relate to the preliminary finding that orders are just and equitable, or has the decision abolished the original structure of the 4 step approach completely?
Do they only relate to the preliminary finding that orders are just and equitable, or has the decision abolished the original structure of the 4 step approach completely?
