Hi guys,
Hoping someone might have some advice for me. A few years ago I negotiated to have a clause added to my contract that meant my employer had to give me an extra week of paid leave each year. Last year, the company changed their trading name and told us we would all be required to sign new contracts with the new business name. We were advised verbally that no other changes to our contracts had been made - they were exactly the same other than the name change. We were asked to simply sign the new contracts and return them. I've since discovered that the new contract I signed actually had this leave clause removed.
My question is - since I signed the new contract, do I just have to suck it up? Or would I be able to argue that it was misrepresentation on their part not tell me they had altered another part of the contract?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hoping someone might have some advice for me. A few years ago I negotiated to have a clause added to my contract that meant my employer had to give me an extra week of paid leave each year. Last year, the company changed their trading name and told us we would all be required to sign new contracts with the new business name. We were advised verbally that no other changes to our contracts had been made - they were exactly the same other than the name change. We were asked to simply sign the new contracts and return them. I've since discovered that the new contract I signed actually had this leave clause removed.
My question is - since I signed the new contract, do I just have to suck it up? Or would I be able to argue that it was misrepresentation on their part not tell me they had altered another part of the contract?
Thanks in advance for your help.