SA Retrospective TPD Insurance Claim?

Discussion in 'Superannuation Law Forum' started by SleeplessInSalisbury, 16 January 2018.

  1. SleeplessInSalisbury

    SleeplessInSalisbury Active Member

    Joined:
    12 August 2017
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hi Everyone,

    Does anyone know if the decision of a super company to accept a retrospective TPD claim is based on their choice or guided by legislation? I would like to claim for a disability which occured in 2010. At the time, was not aware I had the TPD insurance and by the time I realised I was eligible. By the time I realised I could claim, the legislation regarding the definition of total and permanent disability changed and I was no longer eligible.

    Any insight would be greatly appreciated. :):D:)
     
    Timnuts likes this.
  2. Owais

    Owais Lawyer
    LawTap Verified

    Joined:
    18 June 2018
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hi SleeplessInSalisbury,

    I just recently joined Lawanswers and came across your query. Not sure if you have resolved this issue already but I will answer to your question just in case.

    TPD claims work a little differently. When you initially received TPD insurance cover, you may have received an insurance policy. Within the policy you will find many TPD definitions. Now depending on your "Date of Claim", the insurer will determine the applicable definition and see whether your injury or illness meets that TPD definition.

    The legislation refers to insurer following the definitions appropriately however the legislation does not contain any TPD definition. The definition is within the insurance policy.

    Let me know if you still need any assistance regarding your potential TPD claim. I am actually a TPD solicitor who has worked with large Life Insurance companies in the past and have an in-depth knowledge regarding TPD regulation and laws.

    I hope that helps. Feel free to get in touch.

    Kind regards
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    Timnuts likes this.
  3. SleeplessInSalisbury

    SleeplessInSalisbury Active Member

    Joined:
    12 August 2017
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hi owais,
    Thank you for taking time out to respond to my inquiry. I have not resolved this actually. I had obtained the assistance from a TPD law firm and all they did was access my self represented claim from the super fund which was rejected. They then stated that they could not do anything as my new job is somewhat similar, ( totally different, I was a community midwife prior to brain damage.

    I am now a Disability support worker which is basically a glorified chef and cleaner) I had to obtain additional training as my previous degrees were not applicable.

    The TPD was packaged with super, not taken out in addition to.
     
  4. Owais

    Owais Lawyer
    LawTap Verified

    Joined:
    18 June 2018
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hi SleeplessInSalisbury,

    Looks like not much effort was given to your matter by the previous solicitors. I am not sure which TPD definition was applicable to your case and on what grounds your claim was rejected. However, reviewing the limited information you have provided, I assume you were assessed under an ETE (Employment, Training and Education) definition where it refers to whether you can return to the same or similar occupation. Certain jobs may seem similar but they may be different in nature as you have noted above. I have seen many claims getting refused as the insurances consider two job roles to be same or similar in nature. Nonetheless, this is not always the case and certain claims can be approved with proper evidence and supporting documents.

    I am happy to discuss further with you. Feel free to contact us as our details are verified by LawTap.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...
gt;