I read s29(1) as meaning that you do NOT need a written acknowledgement if you meet the conditions in s29(1)(a) i - vi to be able to act for both parties.
And if you do not meet any of those conditions but you meet s29(1)(b) by having a written acknowledgement then you can act for both parties.
Hub of the question: Is it ALWAYS necessary to have written acknowledgement when acting for both parties?
And if you do not meet any of those conditions but you meet s29(1)(b) by having a written acknowledgement then you can act for both parties.
Hub of the question: Is it ALWAYS necessary to have written acknowledgement when acting for both parties?
