As far as I understand it, to be convicted of indecent behaviour, ‘intention’ of the accused to offend or insult needs to be made out...intention is based on wider population expectations, not personal views. Do you really want to risk the kids seeing you and a complaint being made? I agree with the comments above, you are playing with fire if you continue.
Lets be clear, this has not happened yet. But i want definative written proof that i am in the wrong, not opinion. That is why i came here. In search of definative proof that i am or am not in the wrong. What are MY rights not theirs.
There is the example of a guy in melboure nuding up in protest of a 2 story development that made the news, he was free to do so. But he had intent to offend and insult?? Ive read about a couple being seen having sex in their yard by neighbouring children in nsw and weren’t charged because they werent seen by “the public.”
Surely if i nude up not intending to be seen, or interact with anyone, then i am free to do so on my private property which is not open to the public. A neighbour is not the public. They spy on me then there is no intent on my behalf. If i climb a ladder nude and say g’day to them then sure, there is your intent. Throw the book at me.
Is there anyone on here with legal knowledge not just opinion?
