LawAnswers.com.au - Australia's #1 Legal Community

LawAnswers.com.au is a community of 10,000+ Australians, just like you, helping each other.
Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
Join us, it only takes a minute:

Australian Law Omitted Legislation - Still Enforceable?

Discussion in 'Other/General Law Forum' started by Mctinman, 14 October 2014.

  1. Mctinman

    Mctinman Member

    Joined:
    14 October 2014
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good Afternoon,

    If a provision within an Act has been omitted, yet still referenced to in various journals. Is it still enforceable Australian law even though it cannot be located in up to date legislation?

    I am referring to the ADR provisions in ss100-120 of the Supreme Court of QLD Act 1991.

    Thanks for the assistance.
     
  2. Sarah J

    Sarah J Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16 July 2014
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    243
    If the provision has been amended or repealed, then the old version is no longer in force. The amended version of the legislation is the one taking effect. Where an act/incident happened prior to the amendment, it will still be subject to the provision (pre-amendment). This is because retrospective actions cannot apply. Where an act/incident happened after the amendment, it will no longer be subject to the provision (post-amendment). Every amendment/repeal is made by an amendment/repealing act. You will need to locate this act (it is usually identified in the margins of the effective legislation) and in this act, it will tell you when this amendment takes effect.

    Journals and books may be old and reflect older versions of the law. Always check the date of the journal and books and best to use them as a reference guide only. Always use the original source (i.e. the legislation or case law) where possible.
     
  3. Mctinman

    Mctinman Member

    Joined:
    14 October 2014
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the help, but I am still having issues understanding. This act stipulated the provisions have been omitted not repealed or amended. Could it be said the omission of a provision is akin to it being repealed?

    Thanks
     
  4. Sarah J

    Sarah J Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16 July 2014
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    243
    1. Are you sure the legislation is quoted correctly in the journal/books?
    2. If the provision is not in the current version of the legislation then it is no longer enforceable and has been repealed. An omission, if it was indeed in the previous version of the legislation, means that it is no longer in effect.
    3. However, it may still be applicable to incidents/matters arising before the repeal.
     
  5. Mctinman

    Mctinman Member

    Joined:
    14 October 2014
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes it has been referenced in several articles.
    The provisions remain in the annotations of the Act not in full form. Just labeled Ie S 112. Omitted 2011.
    However the key within the Act's annotations also has the term 'repealed', which weren't applied to the omitted provisions.

    Would it be the case both terms in the annotations were drafted to have the same effect on provisions?

    Thanks again
     
  6. Sarah J

    Sarah J Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16 July 2014
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    243
    Yes, it would have the same effect, namely that it is no longer operation and is no longer law.
     

Share This Page

Loading...