Disability Discrimination Law/Local Government Law

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

Johnny G.

Active Member
25 July 2018
10
0
36
I see that there are no sub-forums that would deal directly with my problem.

The following post is very long for which I am sorry, but I feel the need to provide as much information as possible.

I have a matter currently before the Australian Human Rights Commission(AHRC) involving myself/97 year old mother(both disabled) and the Council alleging discrimination.

I live in a house purchased in mid 1970's(it used to be a "weekender" in regional NSW but is now my full time residence) by my parents where we had a separate driveway.

The local council(Council) widened the road/constructed footpath in the early 1980's and our driveway exit was merged with the neighbour empty residential block.

Our driveway runs perpendicular to the road(steep hill/battleaxe block situation).

Neighbours(built on formerly vacant block in the early 1990's) and their visitors repeatedly block my access.

Electricity/utility provider installed a telegraph pole in the mid 1990's significantly blocking our exit path with no opposition from the Council.

Both my mother and myself need AMBULANCE access due to declining health/disabilities.

The NSW Ambulance Service recently wrote to me confirming that they are unable to enter my property and need to park on the street, a long way from the house, as the substandard footpath construction/protective guardrail/steep terrain/telegraph pole means they will not attempt entry.

I am subject to falls and potential vascular events as confirmed by my medical specialist.

Inconsiderate neighbour parking can also block access at any time.

After complaining to the neighbours, I have suffered vandalism to my car and property, and suffered vilification due to my obvious physical handicap.

We have always known, and regularly experienced, that the poorly constructed footpath/intrusive guardrail/intrusive telegraph pole will(and has on many, many times) make access difficult for our family and visitors or tradesmen/delivery drivers.

Collisions have almost occured with passing traffic.

I have almost run over pedestrians on the footpath when reversing due to constrained visibility.

The Council's "purported" dedicated "Road Safety Officer" is not in the least bit interested about these very valid road safety issues.

"Sightlines" - a traffic engineers term describing visibility, are highlighted by a civil engineer to be poor.

Despite many, many years of making formal complaints to Council to rectify the situation, no alteration to the road/footpath hardware has been made by Council.

Council describes the situation as, and I quote, "impossible" to improve - a formal Council resolution stating this in 2014.

My mother, and in the last 8 years since I moved here, have complained to Council so much and so often without result that we have now been categorised by Council as being covered by their “Unreasonable Complainant Conduct Policy”.

I have called/written to/have been visited by the Local State Member.

He has lost interest.

The Minister of Local Government is PATHETIC and is not in the least bit interested in helping, or directing Council to fix the very obvious problem.

Police have taken up to 4 hours to attend to neighbour parking blocking access.

I recently sought help from a traffic/civil engineer, who confirms in writing the difficulty that would be faced by an ambulance crew attempting to enter, but that improvements to the poorly constructed footpath/intrusive guardrail could be made without much engineering difficulty.

(quote from engineers report)

[.....]
It is apparent from inspection (and recognised by [Council] through their documentation) that this is a very tight and difficult to navigate property access. It is further considered that due to the geometric constraints and inability to turn around on site that a driveway in this existing configuration would not be approved today under [Council’s] DCP and other standards. It is reported to us that beyond vehicle turning circles, NSW Ambulance have indicated the site is inaccessible to their emergency vehicle due to the excessive crossfall from the back of the existing footpath down onto the existing access track.

From our experience and capacity as professional engineers our recommendations to improve this access situation include:
[.....]


Council REFUSES TO BUDGE, saying that the problem is not their concern.

According to them this is "a private matter" requiring my family to pay for any improvements - even though it is Council owned hardware that is causing the basic problem.

The AHRC agreed to take up this matter last year.

HOWEVER, I am unable to ascertain from their involvement whether or not they consider that I have a solid case to bring against Council.

The matter is still at "conciliation" stage at present.

After receiving advice from my local legal aid centre it was suggested that I should approach the Australian Centre for Disability Law, Strawberry Hills, Sydney.

They refused to help me, and refused to tell me why they would not act on my behalf, or if I have a "case".

I need advice from those well versed in Disability Discrimination and Local Government law.

The Council is obviously well funded with access to professional advice countering my claim.

Being on the Disability Support Pension(and my mother a War Widow) funds are very limited.

I have vast amounts of documentation/photographs detailing the problems over the years.

Once again, I am sorry for the long post.

Thank you.
 

Johnny G.

Active Member
25 July 2018
10
0
36
I see that there are no sub-forums that would deal directly with my problem.

The following post is very long for which I am sorry, but I feel the need to provide as much information as possible.

I have a matter currently before the Australian Human Rights Commission(AHRC) involving myself/97 year old mother(both disabled) and the Council alleging discrimination.

I live in a house purchased in mid 1970's(it used to be a "weekender" in regional NSW but is now my full time residence) by my parents where we had a separate driveway.

The local council(Council) widened the road/constructed footpath in the early 1980's and our driveway exit was merged with the neighbour empty residential block.

Our driveway runs perpendicular to the road(steep hill/battleaxe block situation).

Neighbours(built on formerly vacant block in the early 1990's) and their visitors repeatedly block my access.

Electricity/utility provider installed a telegraph pole in the mid 1990's significantly blocking our exit path with no opposition from the Council.

Both my mother and myself need AMBULANCE access due to declining health/disabilities.

The NSW Ambulance Service recently wrote to me confirming that they are unable to enter my property and need to park on the street, a long way from the house, as the substandard footpath construction/protective guardrail/steep terrain/telegraph pole means they will not attempt entry.

I am subject to falls and potential vascular events as confirmed by my medical specialist.

Inconsiderate neighbour parking can also block access at any time.

After complaining to the neighbours, I have suffered vandalism to my car and property, and suffered vilification due to my obvious physical handicap.

We have always known, and regularly experienced, that the poorly constructed footpath/intrusive guardrail/intrusive telegraph pole will(and has on many, many times) make access difficult for our family and visitors or tradesmen/delivery drivers.

Collisions have almost occured with passing traffic.

I have almost run over pedestrians on the footpath when reversing due to constrained visibility.

The Council's "purported" dedicated "Road Safety Officer" is not in the least bit interested about these very valid road safety issues.

"Sightlines" - a traffic engineers term describing visibility, are highlighted by a civil engineer to be poor.

Despite many, many years of making formal complaints to Council to rectify the situation, no alteration to the road/footpath hardware has been made by Council.

Council describes the situation as, and I quote, "impossible" to improve - a formal Council resolution stating this in 2014.

My mother, and in the last 8 years since I moved here, have complained to Council so much and so often without result that we have now been categorised by Council as being covered by their “Unreasonable Complainant Conduct Policy”.

I have called/written to/have been visited by the Local State Member.

He has lost interest.

The Minister of Local Government is PATHETIC and is not in the least bit interested in helping, or directing Council to fix the very obvious problem.

Police have taken up to 4 hours to attend to neighbour parking blocking access.

I recently sought help from a traffic/civil engineer, who confirms in writing the difficulty that would be faced by an ambulance crew attempting to enter, but that improvements to the poorly constructed footpath/intrusive guardrail could be made without much engineering difficulty.

(quote from engineers report)

[.....]
It is apparent from inspection (and recognised by [Council] through their documentation) that this is a very tight and difficult to navigate property access. It is further considered that due to the geometric constraints and inability to turn around on site that a driveway in this existing configuration would not be approved today under [Council’s] DCP and other standards. It is reported to us that beyond vehicle turning circles, NSW Ambulance have indicated the site is inaccessible to their emergency vehicle due to the excessive crossfall from the back of the existing footpath down onto the existing access track.

From our experience and capacity as professional engineers our recommendations to improve this access situation include:
[.....]


Council REFUSES TO BUDGE, saying that the problem is not their concern.

According to them this is "a private matter" requiring my family to pay for any improvements - even though it is Council owned hardware that is causing the basic problem.

The AHRC agreed to take up this matter last year.

HOWEVER, I am unable to ascertain from their involvement whether or not they consider that I have a solid case to bring against Council.

The matter is still at "conciliation" stage at present.

After receiving advice from my local legal aid centre it was suggested that I should approach the Australian Centre for Disability Law, Strawberry Hills, Sydney.

They refused to help me, and refused to tell me why they would not act on my behalf, or if I have a "case".

I need advice from those well versed in Disability Discrimination and Local Government law.

The Council is obviously well funded with access to professional advice countering my claim.

Being on the Disability Support Pension(and my mother a War Widow) funds are very limited.

I have vast amounts of documentation/photographs detailing the problems over the years.

Once again, I am sorry for the long post.

Thank you.
My mistake.

In the above post I wrote that the driveway runs "perpendicular" to the road.

It actually runs PARALELL to the road, thereby crossing over the neighbour's driveway exit.

Sorry for the error.
 

Johnny G.

Active Member
25 July 2018
10
0
36
I'm still looking for a specialist in Disability Discrimination law.

Is anyone prepared to give some guidance please?
 

Wikiwebs

Active Member
23 October 2022
8
1
34
DISCLAIMER: I'm not a lawyer.

I just joined this forum, and this 18 month old post caught my attention.

The HRC is not really the best place to take a matter like this. You will get better results from Anti Discrimination NSW, but you may need to trim your case to fit within their jurisdiction. It sounds like you have also been victimised/defamed for reasonably asserting your rights.

Equipment and assistance ​

It is against the law for anybody to treat you unfairly because you have an assistance dog, or because you require specific equipment or assistance because of your disability.
An ambulance is specific equipment or assistance.

It sounds like your council is so toxic that it will require you to have it referred to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal before they start making offers to settle.

Start here (Disability discrimination)

Just copy/paste your explanation above into a complaint. That will be enough to kick it off. The 12 month time limit wont be relevant because the discrimination is on-going.

Post back here if you need further assistance.
 

Johnny G.

Active Member
25 July 2018
10
0
36
@Wikiwebs

Thank you so much for your interest and your input, which is very welcome.

You have been the only one to reply.

I received a Termination Notice from the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) 12 months ago.

I commenced Federal Circuit Court Action.

It finally reached official mediation 2 weeks ago.

THE COUNCIL IS STEADFAST IN THEIR REFUSAL TO MAKE "REASONABLE ADJUSTMENTS".

They say there is no discrimination.

If I go to the formal court process, above and beyond "mediation", I am facing an adverse costs order if I lose.

I am trying to get some free legal advice as to what to do next, without much luck.
 
Last edited:

Johnny G.

Active Member
25 July 2018
10
0
36
The above image is the only one I have at the moment that will "fit" - I am told the other images I have are "too large".

ATM, I don't know how to reduce image file size, but I will try.

The posted image shows a regular occurrence, where the next door neighbour has visitors who park as and where they want, blocking my exit path and any possible ambulance entry.

As I said upthread, it has taken up to 4 hours for the police to respond.

The telegraph pole, placed there in about 1990, and the guardrail and extreme drop hinder ambulance access.

The engineers report quoted in part up thread, details what they believe can be achieved to ensure safe ambulance access.

It concentrates on reprofiling the footpath, cutting back the guardrail and filling the dropoff adjacent to the guardrail for about 6 feet and "smoothing" the entrance "levels", as defined in the NSW Roads Act.

THE COUNCIL JUST DOES NOT WANT TO KNOW.

The NSW Ambulance officials who visited almost 2 years ago said there was no chance that they would attempt to insert an ambulance over the current poorly shaped footpath.

Regular car access is also quite problematic.

The pictures do not convey the extent accurately, but visibility when reversing out is extremely poor.

I am always worried that I may run over a pedestrian, or be hit by a passing car.

Most people get to use a driveway that is perpendicular - 90 degrees access to the road.

NOT ME.

The new mayor visited here 8 years ago whilst he was a Councilor.

His wheels were spinning madly when he tried to reverse out.

He will not reply to my frantic letters.

The full time Council Road Safety Officer will not attend or return telephone calls or letters.

The NSW Minister(s) of Local Government, I have tried a succession of the 2 of them holding office over the last 8 years, has told me to "engage with the councilors", who will not reply to my letters.

No State Government body is prepared to help me.
 
Last edited:

Wikiwebs

Active Member
23 October 2022
8
1
34
"ATM, I don't know how to reduce image file size, but I will try."

Load the image into Microsoft Paint and then simply save it as a JPG format. This will instantly compress most image files from MB down to KB.

DISCLAIMER: The following is opinion only based on personal experiences. I'm not a lawyer.


Here are some non-litigious ideas.

  • Signage. 2 or 3 DIY signs directly where offending drivers can see them from where they must not park. "TOW AWAY ZONE" "DO NOT PARK HERE AMBULANCE ACCESS REQUIRED 24X7" "KEEP CLEAR". The signs could be erected on an overhead structure built for that purpose.
  • Council are (usually) responsible for laying the driveway bitumen from the road edge to your property line. Have you asked them to do that without reference to any requirement for ambulance access or a disability?
  • Get the media on your side ACA, TT, 730 (etc.) - just send them a link to this thread - your summary above is well written and pretty easy to understand.
  • If you haven't already contacted People with Disability then I suggest you physically rock up to their NSW office Level 8, 418A Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010 (1800 422 015) and start a membership conversation with them face to face. See Discrimination - People With Disability
Some litigious options to consider...
  • It’s a point worth making that the NSW Ambulance service could in theory raise a complaint against the council on your behalf under 49B IF your neighbors who do not have your disability have a bitumen driveway that accommodates ambulance access.
  • You could maybe ask NSW Ambulance to help you by being a witness (i.e.. in a stat dec) in your complaint in the FCC to the effect that they are also being discriminated against as an associate of yours. Getting others involved will greatly alter the landscape. They should see it as a part of their service to support you in some small way at least.

49A -What constitutes discrimination on the ground of disability

(1) A person (the perpetrator) discriminates against another person (the aggrieved person) on the ground of disability if the perpetrator—
(a) on the ground of the aggrieved person’s disability or the disability of a relative or associate of the aggrieved person, treats the aggrieved person less favorably than in the same circumstances, or in circumstances which are not materially different, the perpetrator treats or would treat a person who does not have that disability or who does not have such a relative or associate who has that disability, or
(b) requires the aggrieved person to comply with a requirement or condition with which a substantially higher proportion of persons who do not have that disability, or who do not have a relative or associate who has that disability, comply or are able to comply, being a requirement which is not reasonable having regard to the circumstances of the case and with which the aggrieved person does not or is not able to comply.



Let me know your thoughts.
 

Johnny G.

Active Member
25 July 2018
10
0
36
"ATM, I don't know how to reduce image file size, but I will try."

Load the image into Microsoft Paint and then simply save it as a JPG format. This will instantly compress most image files from MB down to KB.

DISCLAIMER: The following is opinion only based on personal experiences. I'm not a lawyer.


Here are some non-litigious ideas.

  • Signage. 2 or 3 DIY signs directly where offending drivers can see them from where they must not park. "TOW AWAY ZONE" "DO NOT PARK HERE AMBULANCE ACCESS REQUIRED 24X7" "KEEP CLEAR". The signs could be erected on an overhead structure built for that purpose.
  • Council are (usually) responsible for laying the driveway bitumen from the road edge to your property line. Have you asked them to do that without reference to any requirement for ambulance access or a disability?
  • Get the media on your side ACA, TT, 730 (etc.) - just send them a link to this thread - your summary above is well written and pretty easy to understand.
  • If you haven't already contacted People with Disability then I suggest you physically rock up to their NSW office Level 8, 418A Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010 (1800 422 015) and start a membership conversation with them face to face. See Discrimination - People With Disability
Some litigious options to consider...
  • It’s a point worth making that the NSW Ambulance service could in theory raise a complaint against the council on your behalf under 49B IF your neighbors who do not have your disability have a bitumen driveway that accommodates ambulance access.
  • You could maybe ask NSW Ambulance to help you by being a witness (i.e.. in a stat dec) in your complaint in the FCC to the effect that they are also being discriminated against as an associate of yours. Getting others involved will greatly alter the landscape. They should see it as a part of their service to support you in some small way at least.

49A -What constitutes discrimination on the ground of disability

(1) A person (the perpetrator) discriminates against another person (the aggrieved person) on the ground of disability if the perpetrator—
(a) on the ground of the aggrieved person’s disability or the disability of a relative or associate of the aggrieved person, treats the aggrieved person less favorably than in the same circumstances, or in circumstances which are not materially different, the perpetrator treats or would treat a person who does not have that disability or who does not have such a relative or associate who has that disability, or
(b) requires the aggrieved person to comply with a requirement or condition with which a substantially higher proportion of persons who do not have that disability, or who do not have a relative or associate who has that disability, comply or are able to comply, being a requirement which is not reasonable having regard to the circumstances of the case and with which the aggrieved person does not or is not able to comply.



Let me know your thoughts.
Thank you once again for your interest and your suggestions.

Today I called PWD Surrey Hills.

I am yet to receive a return call, but I understand that they would be pressed for time.

The other suggestions are potentially useful.

Again, thank you.