Curious what is conflict of interest in regards to legal representation if representatives are representing either party in a matter ie today an applicant impartial or respondent.
Is a direct or perceived conflict legal?
In relation to an area of law subject to my questions is it JUSTICE for 1 party to be successful in 96%+ of all cases with the 4% made up of respondents capable of self funded representation resulting in a short matter upto 3 months typically 4 to 8 weeks with the resultant cases closing with no contest
With tax payer funded matters drawn out a minimum of 2.5 years and cessation or agreeance even if contrary to binding act
Is a direct or perceived conflict legal?
In relation to an area of law subject to my questions is it JUSTICE for 1 party to be successful in 96%+ of all cases with the 4% made up of respondents capable of self funded representation resulting in a short matter upto 3 months typically 4 to 8 weeks with the resultant cases closing with no contest
With tax payer funded matters drawn out a minimum of 2.5 years and cessation or agreeance even if contrary to binding act