NSW Trespass

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

Rod

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
27 May 2014
7,726
1,056
2,894
www.hutchinsonlegal.com.au
And the key argument supporting me not being occupier?

Being a 'mere occupier' is the issue, rather than an occupier with rights of possession.

So in your situation, son living at home with parents, you are all occupiers, but with different rights:
Parents = Occupiers with right of exclusive possession
Son = Occupier with licence to live at the property

There are different rights afforded to a mere occupier (think licensee) versus an occupier who has rights of possession. It is the occupier with exclusive possession who has the right to sue for trespass. An occupier who merely has a license (such as boarder, or son and daughter living with parents and parents have ownership of the land) has no right to sue for trespass. Now re-read the case again looking at the section headed Right to Sue

Keep in mind rights can be transferred at various times, such as if parents go overseas for say 8 weeks leaving control of the property to their son.
 
Last edited:

Jaywoo220

Well-Known Member
11 November 2019
397
5
589
Question:

What if there were three plaintiffs - mother, father, son

Instead of one - son.

Does that solve the issue of exclusive posession?
 

Rod

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
27 May 2014
7,726
1,056
2,894
www.hutchinsonlegal.com.au

Jaywoo220

Well-Known Member
11 November 2019
397
5
589
Still think the case is a dodgy interpretation of law though. I live at the premises, I am left the property, I have right / permission to tell people to get off property. Thanks for the insight, you have been really helpful.
 

Rod

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
27 May 2014
7,726
1,056
2,894
www.hutchinsonlegal.com.au
At a personal level I don't disagree with you.

I think occupiers with a right to stay/live at a property should have some right (qualified in some way) to trespass. Having said that, I can see issues in rooming houses, aged care and share houses where one occupier objects to another occupiers friend and tells them to leave. There can also be issues where one sibling has a dislike of another sibling's friend. Should trespass apply in these situations? How do you write a law that covers the many exceptions that apply in real life? The law is often a very blunt instrument and is more akin to a large hammer than a surgeon's knife.
 

sammy01

Well-Known Member
27 September 2015
5,152
720
2,894
Yeah - this happened nearly a year ago. The cops did nothing then. They're gonna do nothing now. Civil action is a waste of time and you could lose and be forced to pay costs.
 

Jaywoo220

Well-Known Member
11 November 2019
397
5
589
The only issue related to a successful civil law claim for trespass is the exclusive possession of land aspect.