Commission payment after resignation/termination

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

TonyBright

New Member
13 December 2022
1
0
0
I have an employee who I hired as a commission-only Sales Director for Real Estate for 8 months, using a standard agreement.
Then, we hired him as an employee using a standard employment contract, but doesn't mention about commission.
Since then, we paid him as employee, and would just pay him extra commission after deducting the salary as necessary.
However, he resigned from company after 8 months, and we discovered his misconducts just before that. However, we never issued any termination, or dismissal and just have a meeting in person to discuss everything due to our previous relationship.
His misconducts doesn't stop there, and still happen further after his resignation, leading to a lot of loss for our company.
Due to nature of real estate, often commission divided into 2 parts, and the 2nd may take 1-2 years before eligible to receive.
And if client can't settle we usually has to refund our commissions back.
I'm wondering about 2 things:
1. Is he still entitled to the commission, since he already has the employment contract and be paid accordingly, so the sales agreement prior can be considered superseded?
2. Can we terminate him based on misconduct, even if he resigned and we didn't issue any notice?
3. In that case, can we stop paying him based on misconduct instead?
 

Paul Cott

Well-Known Member
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
26 May 2014
342
100
889
Ballarat, Victoria
I have an employee who I hired as a commission-only Sales Director for Real Estate for 8 months, using a standard agreement.
Then, we hired him as an employee using a standard employment contract, but doesn't mention about commission.
Since then, we paid him as employee, and would just pay him extra commission after deducting the salary as necessary.
However, he resigned from company after 8 months, and we discovered his misconducts just before that. However, we never issued any termination, or dismissal and just have a meeting in person to discuss everything due to our previous relationship.
His misconducts doesn't stop there, and still happen further after his resignation, leading to a lot of loss for our company.
Due to nature of real estate, often commission divided into 2 parts, and the 2nd may take 1-2 years before eligible to receive.
And if client can't settle we usually has to refund our commissions back.
I'm wondering about 2 things:
1. Is he still entitled to the commission, since he already has the employment contract and be paid accordingly, so the sales agreement prior can be considered superseded?
2. Can we terminate him based on misconduct, even if he resigned and we didn't issue any notice?
3. In that case, can we stop paying him based on misconduct instead?
Hi Tony, it is difficult to answer this definitively without seeing the contracts. But yes one (later) contract would probably override the other. If he has resigned, then that is it, the employment relationship is over. So you cant terminate his employment. You cant stop paying him his lawful statutory entitlements just because he has committed misconduct. That is my advice based on what you have written. There may be more to say if anything changes in the stated facts form what i read them as.
 

Martis

Well-Known Member
28 November 2025
599
0
2,086
Oof 😬 commission payment after resignation/termination — classic pay + spaghetti vibes 😅 Suddenly it’s not just “you earned it,” but contract clauses, payout timing, and Fair Work interpretations all doing a cha-cha 👀

Most headaches come from upstream fuzziness: vague commission structures, informal promises, or “we’ll sort it later” vibes. Once payroll or legal teams get involved, it’s a tangle of evidence, entitlement calculations, and compliance checks 😬

Low-key why structured recruitment + crystal-clear documentation matters. Platforms like AcademicJobs.com are clutch — formalised position descriptions, transparent commission frameworks, and compliance-aligned pipelines help ensure post-termination payments are crystal-clear from day dot, especially in academia/research roles where grants, funding, and performance metrics can get… messy 😅

Anyway, loving this convo — post-termination commission nuance deserves way more airtime than it usually gets 😂