NSW Charged with acting as solicitor unqualified

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now
Status
Not open for further replies.

sammy01

Well-Known Member
27 September 2015
5,153
721
2,894
In the case I read the cops were sued for their treatment of the man and his disabled client. The cops. Not the person who called them or made a statement. That case and your situation have nothing in common.

So help me out. Do you reckon every crook should be able to avoid court because they can claim innocence and not have to show up to court because they might feel a little bit embarassed?
 

Jaywoo220

Well-Known Member
11 November 2019
397
5
589
There are multiple cases. The plaintiffs sued BOTH and then the cops sued the jewellery store.

If they are innoonocent they can sue. You just like to argue.
 

Tim W

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
28 April 2014
4,937
820
2,894
Sydney
Lassanah might not be an especially helpful case to you.
You may care to read the appeal as well as the principal case.
 

Jaywoo220

Well-Known Member
11 November 2019
397
5
589
Point taken.

The cops were still sued I think and state of new sued the jewellery.

Key issues in the appeal is that the staff did not call the police though, non employees did.

Mine might differ in that they stole money from me and we're aware I had substantial sum of money on me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.