Australia's #1 for Law

Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!

APRA and Agreement Clause of Original Song?

Discussion in 'Intellectual Property Law Forum' started by Music Man, 26 August 2015.

  1. Music Man

    Music Man Active Member

    17 September 2014
    Likes Received:

    I have an original song that has been shortlisted by a client for a possible sync licensing deal. I wrote, performed and paid for the recording in question and so own the masters. And I am self-published so the publishing is under 'Control'. I am a member of APRA so all back end royalties will be collected by them.

    There is a clause in the contract which seems standard enough (or not?), though I am not too sure, since it mentions "sides" something I have not heard before, thus why I wanted to get second opinion. Here is the clause:

    "This agreement requires you to grant a non–exclusive licence for the rights to the recording and the rights to the composition. These are also called “sides”, the master–side and publishing–side. It is a standard industry practice that this will be split 50/50 between the owners of the master and the owners of the publishing."
  2. Therese

    Therese Well-Known Member

    11 October 2015
    Likes Received:
    Hi Music Man,

    Unfortunately I am not familiar with the standard industry practice however a 50/50 split seems a bit much.

    My understanding is that contract are normally able to be negotiated on both sides prior to it being signed.

    On The Arts Law Centre of Australia website I was unable to locate the exact answer, but it has some useful sources.

    My suggestion would be to get in contact with an expert organisation or body. Perhaps even a legal aid centre or a lawyer would be able to provide some advice prior to entering into the contract.
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...

Share This Page