evidence law

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now
The law of evidence, also known as the rules of evidence, encompasses the rules and legal principles that govern the proof of facts in a legal proceeding. These rules determine what evidence must or must not be considered by the trier of fact in reaching its decision. The trier of fact is a judge in bench trials, or the jury in any cases involving a jury. The law of evidence is also concerned with the quantum (amount), quality, and type of proof needed to prevail in litigation. The rules vary depending upon whether the venue is a criminal court, civil court, or family court, and they vary by jurisdiction.
The quantum of evidence is the amount of evidence needed; the quality of proof is how reliable such evidence should be considered. Important rules that govern admissibility concern hearsay, authentication, relevance, privilege, witnesses, opinions, expert testimony, identification and rules of physical evidence. There are various standards of evidence, standards showing how strong the evidence must be to meet the legal burden of proof in a given situation, ranging from reasonable suspicion to preponderance of the evidence, clear and convincing evidence, or beyond a reasonable doubt.
There are several types of evidence, depending on the form or source. Evidence governs the use of testimony (e.g., oral or written statements, such as an affidavit), exhibits (e.g., physical objects), documentary material, or demonstrative evidence, which are admissible (i.e., allowed to be considered by the trier of fact, such as jury) in a judicial or administrative proceeding (e.g., a court of law).
When a dispute, whether relating to a civil or criminal matter, reaches the court there will always be a number of issues which one party will have to prove in order to persuade the court to find in his or her favour. The law must ensure certain guidelines are set out in order to ensure that evidence presented to the court can be regarded as trustworthy.

View More On Wikipedia.org
  1. M

    NSW Disobeying No Stopping Sign

    Hi, I received a fine for "Disobey no stopping sign - $283.00" but based on the date, time and location of the fine I can confirm I did not "stop" but was completing a 3 point turn in a very full dead-end parking lot on the street named in the fine as there was no way to exit the parking...
  2. J

    VIC irrelevant (and prejudicial) information admitted into the case because it's part of the story. VCAT

    Hi Everyone, what's going on here? Despite my objections, irrelevant (and prejudicial) information was admitted into the case because it's "part of the story". (judge's words) Is there such thing in the Evidence act 1995? And my rebuttal evidence (material in reply) to their irrelevant evidence...
  3. J

    NSW Subpoena Material Redacted (except still visible)

    Hi and thanks for reading my question. I'm involved in a parenting (only) matter and the other party has been allowed to redact some sensitive information in the subpeonas (we had a Objection Hearing) What seems odd is the redaction was just not effective - that is I could still read what they...
  4. H

    Can Accused Offenders Seek Humiliation Damages?

    The accused killer of Stephanie Scott, a teacher killed in country NSW, is currently at trial. This morning, a reporter on the major national breakfast show Sunrise declared that details have emerged of the accused's online behaviour. He had apparently searched for Neo-Nazi propaganda and...
  5. J

    WA Magistrates Court Minor Claim - Evidence of Credibility

    I am the respondent in a minor claim in the Magistrates Court over the supply of a new driveway. My defence under evidence law is the Plaintiff's breach of contract, actual and implied, under contract law. I have withheld around 30% of the contract value and the plaintiff is attempting to...
  6. D

    VIC Recording Phone Calls - Illegal or Use as Evidence?

    Situation: Used car dealer kept fixing my car for 8 months without contacting me. So I hounded them over the phone and copped some abuse so I started voice recording every phone conversation in the hopes that I could take it to court and use it as evidence of abuse and their unwillingness to...
  7. M

    VIC Police Investigation Evidence - What If They Can't Find Suspect?

    There is a current investigation with a person by the police. The victim in the situation still needs to be interviewed by police which is happening in a few days. The main suspect his family plan on hiding him interstate. Would there still be a investigation? What happens if they can't find the...
  8. P

    VIC Obtaining a Copy of Brief of Evidence from DPP and TGA?

    Hi. I have been charged with importing vitamin supplements including melatonin which is a prescription only item in Australia (although can be found on supermarket shelves in the US and UK). On May 19, the TGA informed me via email that their Brief of Evidence has been submitted to the Director...
  9. B

    VIC Deliberate False Evidence to Undermine Trust?

    What is the term for deliberately false evidence to undermine trust? I will explain better: Someone unknown unexpectedly for you comes up with a "helpful" "evidence" and tries to help you. But this "help" is a false evidence deliberately form the beginning and organised such a way so opposition...
  10. M

    VIC Can Secret Recordings be used as Evidence to Immigration?

    If someone was secretly phone recording or video recording someone without there knowledge. Can that be used as evidence to the immigration people?