My 10-year-old son was suspended on Wed and Thurs (short suspension) for a fight that happened on Monday previously. His friend wouldn't let him past out of the cricket nets (limited area to pass by) and while the friend was blocking him (his back to my son) my son put his hands on the other boy's upper arms to move him aside so he could go to the toilet. This boy then raised his elbow and hit my son in the face with quite a bit of force, causing my son to stumble forwards. The other boy while slightly shorter is stocky too and had to reach up to make contact with my son's face. This was not an accident as the parents claim. The other boy ran off, my son got angry and gave chase. The other boy ran back into the cricket nets and was cornered. My son and he grabbed each other's hands (linking fingers) and were kicking each other in the shins. The other boy then ran off. No adult saw the incident and it was not reported by anyone. An email was sent to the school Monday evening from the other boy's parents to with photos of injuries that this family claim my son had caused (scratches on his upper back, on his torso and a bruise on his arm). I would dispute all three photos as my son didn't scratch the other boy (front and back) and with linking fingers, there's no way he could have punched him in the arm causing the bruise. The boy has older sisters which beg the question there. However, back to the suspension. The principal contacted me on Wed to say my son was suspended for 2 days for fighting. He wanted to suspend him for the last day and first day back in 2016. I pleaded if I could pick him up immediately and have the 2-day suspension completed by the last day of term. He agreed. I still didn't have a clear idea of what my son had done and went into the school to find out. My son was made a prefect for 2016, chosen by the teachers and has had exemplary behaviour prior to this incident. The other boy put himself forward to be a prefect, too, and was not chosen. His mother told me at the soccer field how upset he was and the whole process was 'rigged' (prior to the fight). Now this other boy who initially hit my son in the face and caused numbness in his face for a couple of days did not get suspended. I asked the principal why and his explanation was 'it's his first offence', as it was my son's first offence also. I dispute the photos were caused by my son, and as they were taken after school, and no report was made by the fight, the injuries could have happened at any time before or after the incident either in school or outside school. I am a newly single parent and the issue of our 'family circumstances' was brought up several times in the meeting, even though my husband was there too, in support of finding out why our son was suspended (we went into the school on Thursday to ask the questions as to why he was suspended). The school counsellor had seen my son to check-in that he was ok at my request in Term 3. The separation has been calm and civilised. However, the Principal termed that my son now has 'anger issues', which simply isn't the case prior, following or currently. I have spoken to the counsellor who was very positive that my son was quiet and well-adjusted. My problem with this scenario is that we have been treated unfairly. How can it be that my son retaliated to being hit in the face with kicking in the shins and he is suspended and the other boy is not? The other boy caused a head injury and isn't being given a consequence. They are all taking the photos as a given that my son caused the injuries, however, it doesn't make sense how the scratches on the back could happen when he didn't touch his back at all and the same with the front injuries due to the linking of the hands/fingers. The father is a lawyer and I feel that whatever the spin was put on the incident, whether they want their son to be prefect in place of mine, I'm not sure, but the situation really seems unjust.