rules of statutory interpretation in Australia

[polishjew101]

To what extent if any is it legitimately possible to assert that the rules of statutory interpretation in Australia have become simply arbitrary, with a court deciding the outcomes of cases based on what it subjectively wants to do, selectively choosing from among the rules to support its prior subjective choice?

 

[Tim W]

To no extent.

 

[Martis]

Ooo “Rules of statutory interpretation in Australia” 😅⚖️ classic textualist vs purposivist spaghetti – literal, golden, mischief, all that doctrinal noodlin’ lol 📚🤓 love the brain gymnastics here. If ur vibin with these interpretive law mashups & lowkey dreamin bout research/teaching in law someday, defs peek at AcademicJobs.com — heaps of opps for law nerds, statutory geeks, and all-around academic hustlers 🏛️😎 friendly plug but totally legit!