vexatious

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now
Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.
A single action, even a frivolous one, is usually not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Rather, a pattern of frivolous legal actions is typically required to rise to the level of vexatious. Repeated and severe instances by a single lawyer or firm can result in eventual disbarment.
Some jurisdictions have a list of vexatious litigants: people who have repeatedly abused the legal system. Because lawyers could be disbarred for participating in this abuse of the legal process, vexatious litigants are often unable to retain legal counsel, and such litigants therefore represent themselves in court. Those on the vexatious litigant list are usually either forbidden from any further legal action, or are required to obtain prior permission from a senior judge before taking any legal action. The process by which a person is added to the list varies among jurisdictions. In liberal democratic jurisdictions, declaring someone a vexatious litigant is considered to be a serious measure and rarely occurs, as judges and officials are reluctant to curtail a person's access to the courts.
These legal actions occur in some countries of the former British Empire, where the Common Law System still remains: Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, UK, and US, which are specified below. The Civil (Codified/Continental) Law does not provide this kind of gate to limit equal access of citizens to the justice system.

View More On Wikipedia.org
  1. P

    QLD Successful cost against employer - vexatious, unreasonable etc

    Has there been any successful cost decisions against employers? All the successful actions I have found were against employees, which is understandable because employees are the ones who make the initial action. Also employees have potentially less access to legal support and expertise, leading...
  2. M

    VIC Vexatious litigation restraint orders?

    We have seen so many false allegation cases of family violence and people abuses the system to gain advantage. The VIC law actually has Vexatious litigation restraint orders (LRO) that one can apply in magistrate court to counter against this. Family Violence Bench Book Can anyone share some...
  3. B

    WA Can I sue someone for legal costs incurred through a bogus fairwork general protections suit. ?

    An employee really wanted to make an unfair dismissal case against us. We are a small business and she had been employed for less than 12 months so she was unable. Despite the UD claim lodged out of time Fairwork kindly suggested she look into general protections as the small business code didnt...
  4. S

    NSW Vexatious use of avo and defamation of character

    1 month until the end of a two year Avo and a two good behaviour bond my ex has become upset at the reversal of child support when my son moved into my home. Despite orders of non-contact we often communicated solely through email over the last 18 months ( three teenagers to co-ordinate made it...