Speaking of criminals, why are judges and magistrates above the law?
If a person allows a dangerous dog out on the street and it bites someone, they are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Now, my question is, if a judge or magistrate allows a criminal out on bail against the wishes of the police, (which can and does happen) why are they not held responsible (legally, morally and financially) for any crimes that that person commits while out on bail?
If a person allows a dangerous dog out on the street and it bites someone, they are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Now, my question is, if a judge or magistrate allows a criminal out on bail against the wishes of the police, (which can and does happen) why are they not held responsible (legally, morally and financially) for any crimes that that person commits while out on bail?