I have a final order that states that I can change my son's residential address under the provision that I give the father 3 months notice on the intended suburb.
2.5 months ago an email was sent to the father stating that I was moving to a shire. For staters, I can only have access to about 2 km of this shire due to a restriction from the Sydney GPO. But I admit I misread the court orders that stated that I needed to provide a suburb. 2 weeks before we move into our new place the father is stating that I can't move because I didn't give them a suburb, which in his terms i'm breaching orders.
The fact is the bond has been paid for and we've given notice to our current landlord. We need to move since we will have no house at our current address as of two weeks time. Can I have your opinions on what could happen next?
2.5 months ago an email was sent to the father stating that I was moving to a shire. For staters, I can only have access to about 2 km of this shire due to a restriction from the Sydney GPO. But I admit I misread the court orders that stated that I needed to provide a suburb. 2 weeks before we move into our new place the father is stating that I can't move because I didn't give them a suburb, which in his terms i'm breaching orders.
The fact is the bond has been paid for and we've given notice to our current landlord. We need to move since we will have no house at our current address as of two weeks time. Can I have your opinions on what could happen next?