Hello
I had been working for my employer for 9 years and 3 months and recently resigned after my 12 month materinty leave was up to stay at home and look after my child full time.
I have requested that i be paid out my long service leave (pro rata) due to domestic necessity. My employer has rejected my claim. This stance was also backed up by NSW IR when i contacted them and the case manager said i couldnt meet the burden of proof required.
My question is - what do i need to show to prove that staying home to look after my child is domestic necessity? Is referring the case below enough for my claim or is there more i need to do to prove my claim?
Looking online i have found references to Donnelly v South Maitland Railways Pty Ltd 1964 (in and IR NSW PDF http://www.industrialrelations.nsw.gov.au/biz_res/oirwww/pdfs/Long_Service_Leave_2015.pdf )
It is also not financially viable for me to return to work at this stage but from what i can see this is secondary to the original reason.
thanks
I had been working for my employer for 9 years and 3 months and recently resigned after my 12 month materinty leave was up to stay at home and look after my child full time.
I have requested that i be paid out my long service leave (pro rata) due to domestic necessity. My employer has rejected my claim. This stance was also backed up by NSW IR when i contacted them and the case manager said i couldnt meet the burden of proof required.
My question is - what do i need to show to prove that staying home to look after my child is domestic necessity? Is referring the case below enough for my claim or is there more i need to do to prove my claim?
Looking online i have found references to Donnelly v South Maitland Railways Pty Ltd 1964 (in and IR NSW PDF http://www.industrialrelations.nsw.gov.au/biz_res/oirwww/pdfs/Long_Service_Leave_2015.pdf )
It is also not financially viable for me to return to work at this stage but from what i can see this is secondary to the original reason.
thanks