September last year I was issued with an extended 3 year IVO. The magistrate based her decision on probability as opposed to any facts or evidence. I wanted a contested hearing but was talked out of it by my solicitor. The Ex stated in court that there had been multiple breeches and statements were made to the police. The police stated that there were no statements made against me. She also claimed that she had evidence of these so called breeches. She was asked by the court to present the evidence and copies of any statements, she failed to produce anything.
On my copy of the IVO it clearly states that I did not agree to the order being made. So based upon this and the probability part, would I have any chance in getting the order revoked? I have not seen my kids in almost 2 years and each day it just kills me just that little bit more. I should also mention that the kids are also on the order.
On my copy of the IVO it clearly states that I did not agree to the order being made. So based upon this and the probability part, would I have any chance in getting the order revoked? I have not seen my kids in almost 2 years and each day it just kills me just that little bit more. I should also mention that the kids are also on the order.