Hi everyone,
Thanks in advance, I would just like to know if the following scenario is considered to be "Perverting the course of Justice".
1. Individual "A" has a Family Parenting Order made in January 2018 with Individual "B".
2. Individual "A" has an intervention order taken out against them by the police for serious misconduct to do with their children and the intervention order also suspends the Family Parenting Order made in January 2018 under section 68r of the Family Law Act so that only Individual "B" has parental responsibility.
3. Individual "A" writes in an affidavit for court on Monday that they acknowledge the parenting order of 2018 has been suspended by section 68r of the family law act under the intervention order. This is also signed by Individual "A".
4. Individual "A" then visits the police station where breaches of the intervention order by the children's school have been reported to stating that the parenting plan of 2018 overrides the intervention order (despite acknowledging in their affidavit that the parenting order is suspended) of 2019 and somehow convinces a constable that they are correct, the constable believes them. This allows Individual "A" to breach the intervention order by stalking their children until one of the children notify individual "B" that they are scared of individual "A" who they have noticed is following them.
5. Individual "A" prior to visiting the police station also states to the school that the Family Parenting order of 2018 overrides the intervention order of 2019 (despite what is mentioned in point 3).
Is this an example of Perverting the Course of Justice by admitting that the Family Order is suspended in their signed affidavit prior to visiting the police station and convincing the police officer not to charge them?
Thanks in advance, I would just like to know if the following scenario is considered to be "Perverting the course of Justice".
1. Individual "A" has a Family Parenting Order made in January 2018 with Individual "B".
2. Individual "A" has an intervention order taken out against them by the police for serious misconduct to do with their children and the intervention order also suspends the Family Parenting Order made in January 2018 under section 68r of the Family Law Act so that only Individual "B" has parental responsibility.
3. Individual "A" writes in an affidavit for court on Monday that they acknowledge the parenting order of 2018 has been suspended by section 68r of the family law act under the intervention order. This is also signed by Individual "A".
4. Individual "A" then visits the police station where breaches of the intervention order by the children's school have been reported to stating that the parenting plan of 2018 overrides the intervention order (despite acknowledging in their affidavit that the parenting order is suspended) of 2019 and somehow convinces a constable that they are correct, the constable believes them. This allows Individual "A" to breach the intervention order by stalking their children until one of the children notify individual "B" that they are scared of individual "A" who they have noticed is following them.
5. Individual "A" prior to visiting the police station also states to the school that the Family Parenting order of 2018 overrides the intervention order of 2019 (despite what is mentioned in point 3).
Is this an example of Perverting the Course of Justice by admitting that the Family Order is suspended in their signed affidavit prior to visiting the police station and convincing the police officer not to charge them?