without disclosing intimate facts -
If a barrister and lawyer do not advice a judge of a letter that the lawyer received from the other party, and the other party (self represented with no legal support and only a high school diploma, with diagnosed adhd and social communications disorder) was so distressed and felt so under duress that they forgot they had sent the letter 17 days before the hearing in question and consented orders that were contrary to a family report and the kids are teenagers-
and the whole of the interim orders were based upon
1. the letter that the judge was not advised has been sent and received and
2. that the person who sent the letter broke down and could not emotionally and physically continue in court
Aside from the SR party forgetting such a key piece of evidence, what legal obligations do the other sides barrister and lawyer have when they know that the truth had not been put before the court (that being the letter they had received 17 days before the hearing)
If a barrister and lawyer do not advice a judge of a letter that the lawyer received from the other party, and the other party (self represented with no legal support and only a high school diploma, with diagnosed adhd and social communications disorder) was so distressed and felt so under duress that they forgot they had sent the letter 17 days before the hearing in question and consented orders that were contrary to a family report and the kids are teenagers-
and the whole of the interim orders were based upon
1. the letter that the judge was not advised has been sent and received and
2. that the person who sent the letter broke down and could not emotionally and physically continue in court
Aside from the SR party forgetting such a key piece of evidence, what legal obligations do the other sides barrister and lawyer have when they know that the truth had not been put before the court (that being the letter they had received 17 days before the hearing)