Hi there After reading a suggestion by a member here to look at previous cases involving relocation on austlii to get a better idea of how cases play out and I have been doing just that. I find them quite confusing, though. I can see where the judge has made orders or passed judgement (if that's the correct term in this context) but often I find it hard to see why they came to the conclusion they did. i.e. I can see all the considerations a judge has taken into account but not a paragraph justifying a decision. In fact, in some cases, it seems the judge says something along the lines of 'it would be detrimental for the children to not have a relationship with X and relocating would jeopardise that relationship' but then the family court orders in the favour of relocation with children. Can anyone give me some tips on how to read these family law cases? Am I being dim? Thanks in advance for any help.