VIC Can We Sue Bank for Negligence?

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

Shezian

Member
23 April 2018
2
0
1
Hi,

I am not sure if this is the correct department for this question. But in 2008, my family and myself invested in a Ponzi scheme, which of course, we weren't aware of the time and ended up losing everything. The bank lent us the money in excess of what we asked for. They were not aware of our investments, nor did they bother to ask before lending us this enormous amount of money.

We invested this money, in a share trading company, which then went bust in 2008. Are we able to file a lawsuit against the bank for negligence?

Kind regards
 

Adam1user

Well-Known Member
5 January 2018
577
33
2,219
Hi,

Sorry for the bad news, but most properly you are not able to do anything against the bank, if the bank lent you money, then they would have followed their procedures for lending and if they broke their policy, then the bank will enforce their policies or review their policies (internal issue).

The bank will not be held liable for your decisions, you will be the person responsible for your actions.

The only way to hold the bank responsible, if you have enough documentation or evidence that the bank advised you to invest in this company, other than that, there is nothing you can do, sorry for the bad news, I hope I'm wrong, if so, someone will write the correct thing.
 

Rod

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
27 May 2014
7,731
1,056
2,894
www.hutchinsonlegal.com.au
Based on the OP's post I can't see a cause of action against the bank.

It would depend on other undisclosed details somehow showing the bank did something wrong.

Australian law is not like what is shown on US TV shows. You don't get to sue someone else for your mistakes purely of your own making.
 

Clancy

Well-Known Member
6 April 2016
973
69
2,289
The bank was not aware of your investments??
So you took a type of loan where you would not have to disclose the investments, was that not a 'red flag' to you?