NSW Protecting the interest of parents' property after my ex moved out from it

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

smallcat

Well-Known Member
8 January 2020
33
0
121
Decades ago, my parents bought a property using their own money as their retirement home. They also put my slibing's and my name as the joint owners, but we paid and contributed absolutely nothing.

My parents lived in this property until 3 years ago, and then moved out temporarily by letting me and my partner (now ex) to move in as we needed to prepare for pregnancy.

Now my partner (now ex) moved out and my parents have moved back in.

My question is: How to protect my parents' interest on their retirement home from being taken away during property settlement or assets division?
 

Atticus

Well-Known Member
6 February 2019
2,011
294
2,394
My question is: How to protect my parents' interest on their retirement home from being taken away during property settlement or assets division?

So basically, the ex shared a house owned by several people, with you, for around 3 years... If there was no financial or non financial contributions to the property itself ( improvements for eg) then it's hard to see any legitimate claim to include it in an asset division... At worst it would only be as a percentage of your share & shouldn't require the sale of it or any cost to your parents..

Other point to make is that if the property is included in the asset pool, being co owners, your sibling & parents have the right to become parties to the case.
 

smallcat

Well-Known Member
8 January 2020
33
0
121
My ex has no financial/non-fin contribution to the property, except sharing the bills. All the renovations / improvements were done by my parents and myself.

I am afraid of the house being in the asset division is because I have a portion of ownership on paper. Worst case means I need to pay the value of 50% of my portion to my ex?

What exactly is "parents become parties to the case"? Do you have any reference I can read more?

Also, when she moved out, she stole a lot of homeware, necessities and food (yes, food!) belong to my parents and slibing. Was she allowed to do so?
 

GlassHalfFull

Well-Known Member
28 August 2018
544
51
2,289
I think worst case is that you need to pay more than 50% to your ex, because of the 'additional needs of caring for the children' if she continues to be the primary carer.

She probably wasn't 'allowed' to do so, but it is nearly impossible to prove it was theft since they were shared property while you were living there. It would not be worth the trouble of pursuing it. When I received an IVO and was removed from my home by my ex, she kept ownership of EVERYTHING in the house including the car in my name. I was told by my lawyer that because she 'needs the property for the children', any attempt to try to sue for recovery would seen very unfavourably by the family court. In other words legal theft of property. As I said to you in other threads, the person who has the children and gets in first with an IVO/AVO wins almost everything. It's morally wrong, but it's the way the law seems to work.
 

Atticus

Well-Known Member
6 February 2019
2,011
294
2,394
Worst case means I need to pay the value of 50% of my portion to my ex?
Not necessarily 50%... Nobody here can tell you what the just & equitable entitlements may be to each party as all cases are different... Beat advice I can give you is to spend a bit of money to get a professional legal opinion... To that end, get together all your financials & figures from relationship beginning to present, & a timeline of events... Take it along to a family law solicitor for an opinion on just & equitable entitlements... Thwen you have a solid, well informed basis for what you are seeking... Courts like that rather than a figure you have plucked out the air.
What exactly is "parents become parties to the case"?
Meaning if a property settlement is filed that includes the house in the asset pool, then because it is co owned, the other owners who also have a financial interest in it, can apply to become a party to proceedings...
Also, when she moved out, she stole a lot of homeware, necessities and food (yes, food!) belong to my parents and slibing. Was she allowed to do so?
See GlassHalfFull post above
 

smallcat

Well-Known Member
8 January 2020
33
0
121
Meaning if a property settlement is filed that includes the house in the asset pool, then because it is co owned, the other owners who also have a financial interest in it, can apply to become a party to proceedings...

I really don't want my parents to be involved and suffer. They have enough disappointment from this nasty daughter-in-law.

What is the implication for my parents to become a party to proceedings? What they need to do or prepare?