Sometime ago, I requested several items from the family home (some personal and a couple of items that there were numerous of - so 4 and 10 in his posession of something and I requested one of each (which a normal home would have)). I was specific about which of these items I wanted. This was done via our lawyers. He agreed to some of the items and 8 months later they were delivered to me via one of our children.
One of the items was not the one I requested and he agreed to provide me with. This was returned to him via our child with a request for the correct item. Nothing was forthcoming despite numerous requests so I had my lawyer write to his requesting the item, as per our agreement, and also comment was made that my request was entirely reasonable considering the number of these items in my ex's possession.
A day later I receive another version of the item, again, not the one we agreed to. Both of the items have been checked over and would need extensive and expensive repairs to be considered in good working order.
It's almost not worth chasing this up with letters between our lawyers. The item is also useless to me as I'm not able to use the particular one he has sent, as well as it would cost me more than it's value to have it repaired.
We are about to settle as per our consent orders. Does this agreeement between us, made via correspondence between our lawyers, mean anything? Is it worth me pursuing? Or should I cut my losses?
One of the items was not the one I requested and he agreed to provide me with. This was returned to him via our child with a request for the correct item. Nothing was forthcoming despite numerous requests so I had my lawyer write to his requesting the item, as per our agreement, and also comment was made that my request was entirely reasonable considering the number of these items in my ex's possession.
A day later I receive another version of the item, again, not the one we agreed to. Both of the items have been checked over and would need extensive and expensive repairs to be considered in good working order.
It's almost not worth chasing this up with letters between our lawyers. The item is also useless to me as I'm not able to use the particular one he has sent, as well as it would cost me more than it's value to have it repaired.
We are about to settle as per our consent orders. Does this agreeement between us, made via correspondence between our lawyers, mean anything? Is it worth me pursuing? Or should I cut my losses?